Using a Student-Generated Survey to Inform Planning For a User-focused Learning Commons
AbstractA master’s comprehensive University is planning a learning commons to support undergraduate learning. The planning process included a literature review, site visits to commons, consultations with experts in the field, discussions with campus specialists, and surveys of patrons. The literature reports two primary forms of data gathering for learning commons: interview/observation and purposive surveys. This report describes the findings of a survey conducted to determine students’ perceptions of services relevant in learning commons. The findings indicated that the students wanted help with their information processing needs.
Guskin, Alan E. and Mary B. Marcy. “Dealing with the Future Now: Principles of Creating a Vital Campus in a Climate of Restricted Resources.” Change 35, no. 4 (2003): 13-14.
Bailey, D. Russell and Barbara Gunter Tierney, Transforming Library Service through Information Commons: Case Studies for the Digital Age (Chicago: American Library Association, 2008), 6-7.
Bracke, Marianne Stowell, Michael Brewer, Robyn Huff-Eibl, Daniel R. Lee, Robert Mitchell, and Michael Ray. “Finding Information in a New Landscape: Developing New Service and Staffing Models for Mediated Information Services.” College & Research Libraries 68, no. 3 (2007): 248-67.
Church, Jennifer. “The Evolving Information Commons.” Library Hi Tech 23, no. 1 (2005): 75-81.
Cowgill, Allison, Joan Beam, and Lindsey Wess. “Implementing an Information Commons in a University Library.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 27, no. 6 (2001): 432-9.
MacWhinnie, Laurie A. “The Information Commons: The Academic Library of the Future.” portal: Libraries and the Academy 3, no. 2 (2003): 241-57.
Spencer, Mary Ellen. “Evolving a New Model: The Information Commons.” Reference Services Review 34, no. 2 (2006): 242-7.
Duderstadt, James J. “Possible Futures for the Research Library in the 21st Century.” Journal of Library Administration 49, no. 3 (2009): 220.
Ritchie, Lorin and Kathlin Ray. “Incorporating Information Literacy into the Building Plan: The American University of Sharjah Experience.” Reference Services Review 36, no. 2 (2008): 167-79.
Shill, Harold B. and Shawn Tonner. “Creating a Better Place: Physical Improvements in Academic Libraries, 1995-2002.” College & Research Libraries 64, no. 6 (2003): 431-66.
Shill, Harold B. and Shawn Tonner. “Does the Building Still Matter? Usage Patterns in New, Expanded, and Renovated Libraries, 1995-2002.” College & Research Libraries 65, no. 2 (2004): 123-50.
Whitchurch, Michael J., C. Jeffrey Belliston, and William Baer. “Information Commons at Brigham Young University: Past, Present, and Future.” Reference Services Review 34, no. 2 (2006): 261-78.
Boyer, Ernest L., College: The Undergraduate Experience in America, (New York: Harper & Row, 1987), 164.
Breivik, Patricia Senn and E. Gordon Gee, Information Literacy: Revolution in the Library. (New York and London: American Council on Education/Macmillan Publishing Company, 1989), 38-9.
Bailey and Tierney. Transforming Library Service.
Bracke, Brewer, and Huff-Eibl. “Finding information,” 248-67.
Franks, Jeffrey A. “Introducing Learning Commons Functionality into a Traditional Reference Setting.” E-JASL: The Electronic Journal of Academic & Special Librarianship 9, no. 2 (2008).
Mahaffy, Mardi. “Exploring Common Ground: US Writing Center/Library Collaboration.” New Library World 109, no. 3/4 (2008): 173-81.
Spencer. “Evolving a new model,” 242-7.
Beagle, Donald Robert, The Information Commons Handbook. (New York and London: Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc., 2006), xvii.
Bailey and Tierney. Transforming Library Service, 2.
Beagle, Information Commons Handbook, 67.
Crockett, C., S. McDaniel, and M. Remy. “Integrating Services in the Information Commons: Toward a Holistic Library and Computing
Environment.” Library Administration & Management 16, no. 4 (2002): 181-6.
Fitzpatrick, EB, AC Moore, and BW Lang. “Reference Librarians at the Reference Desk in a Learning Commons: A Mixed Methods Evaluation.” Journal of Academic Librarianship 34, no. 3 (2008): 231-8.
Gardner, Susan. “Tiered Reference: The New Landscape of the Frontlines.” Electronic Journal of Academic & Special Librarianship 7, no. 3 (2006).
Case, Mary M. “Partners in Knowledge Creation: An Expanded Role for Research Libraries in the Digital Future.” Journal of Library Administration 48, no. 2 (2008): 141-56.
Euster, Joanne R., “The Academic Library: Its Place and Role in the Institution,” In Academic Libraries: Their Rationale and Role in American Higher Education, G. B. McCabe
Education Libraries, Volume 33, No. 1, Spring 2010 22
and R. J. Person, eds., (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1995), 7.
Hendriksen, Sharon Ishiki, Lifen Yang, Barbara Love, and Mary C. Hall. “Assessing Academic Support: The Effects of Tutoring on Student Learning Outcomes.” Journal of College Reading and Learning 35, no. 2 (2005): 61.
Xu, Yonghong, Stacey Hartman, Guillermo Uribe, and Reed Mencke. “The Effects of Peer Tutoring on Undergraduate Students' Final Examination Scores in Mathematics.” Journal of College Reading and Learning 32, no. 1 (2001): 30-31.
Tyson, John C., “The Impact of Emerging Technologies on Library Clientele,” in The Impact of Emerging Technologies on Reference Service and Bibliographic Instruction, G. M. Pitkin, ed., (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1995), 65-6.
Dewey, BI. “Social, Intellectual, and Cultural Spaces: Creating Compelling Library Environments for the Digital Age.” Journal of Library Administration 48, no. 1 (2008): 85-94.
Ritchie and Ray. 2008. “Incorporating Information Literacy,” 167-79.
Shill and Tonner. 2003. “Creating a Better Place,” 431-66.
Shill and Tonner. 2004. “Does the Building still Matter?” 123-50.
Weber, MA, and RK Flatley. “What Do Students Want? A Focus Group
Study of Students at a Mid-Sized Public University.” Library Philosophy & Practice 10, no. 1 (2008): 1-11.
Gorham, Lane. “Assessing the Undergraduates' Use of the University Library.” College & Research Libraries 27, no. 4 (1966): 277-82.
Gardner, S., and S. Eng. “What Students Want: Generation Y and the Changing Function of the Academic Library.” portal: Libraries and the Academy 5, no. 3 (2005): 405-20.
Mahaffy. “Exploring Common Ground,” 179.
Hook, Sheril, “Teaching Librarians and Writing Center Professionals in Collaboration: Complementary Practices,” in Centers for Learning: Writing Centers and Libraries in Collaboration, J. K. Elmborg and S. Hook, eds., (Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries, 2005), 24.
Elmborg, James K., and Sheril Hook, Centers for Learning: Writing Centers and Libraries. (Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries, 2005).
Beagle, The Information Commons Handbook, 1.
Gardner and Eng. “What Students Want.” 405-20.
Schmidt, N., and J. Kaufman. “Learning Commons: Bridging the Academic and Student Affairs Divide to Enhance Learning Across Campus.” Research Strategies 20, no. 4 (2005): 242-56.
Sherman, Stephen C. A User-centered Evaluation of the North Carolina State University Libraries Learning Common. A Master’s Paper for the MS in LS degree, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2008.
Spencer. “Evolving a New Model,” 242-7.
Weber and Flatley. “What Do Students Want?” 1-11.
Ornstein, MD. “Survey Research.” Current Sociology 46, no. 4 (1998): iii-136.
Bailey and Tierney. Transforming Library Service.
Kuh, George D. 2009. The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual Framework and Overview of Psychometric Properties [cited May 5 2009]. Available from http://nsse.iub.edu/2004_annual_report/pdf/2004_Conceptual_Framework.pdf.
Weisberg, Sanford, Applied Linear Regression, 3rd ed. (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Interscience, 2005).
Jolliffe, I. Principal Component Analysis, 2nd ed. (New York: Springer Verlag, 2002).
Draper, Norman R. and Harry Smith, Applied Regression Analysis. (New York: Wiley, 1981).
Fitzpatrick, Moore, and Lang. “Reference Librarians at the Reference Desk,” 231-8.
Hook, Sheril, “Teaching Librarians and Writing Center Professionals in Collaboration: Complementary Practices,” in Centers for Learning: Writing Centers and Libraries in Collaboration, J. K. Elmborg and S. Hook, eds. (Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries, 2005).
Study Hour Formula 2009. Depaul A.C.E. Actively Choosing Education [cited May 5 2009]. Available from http://commerce.depaul.edu/undergrad/docs/About/studyhourformula.pdf.
Everything we publish is freely available. In the spirit of encouraging free open access journals, Education Libraries applies the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) to all works we publish (read the summary or the full license legal code ). • Authors retain copyright and grant Education Libraries right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. Under the CCAL, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors allow anyone to read, download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles in Education Libraries, so long as the original authors and source are cited. No permission is required from the authors or the publishers. In most cases, appropriate attribution can be provided by citing the original article in Education Libraries. For any reuse or distribution of a work, you must also make clear the license terms under which the work was published. This broad license was developed to facilitate open access to, and free use of, original works of all types. Applying this standard license ensures your right to make your work freely and openly available. By submitting a manuscript for review, author(s) acknowledge first publication rights are granted to Education Libraries. Submission of a manuscript implies that the work described has not been published; that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; and that its publication has been approved by all coauthors and the responsible authorities at the institute where the work was conducted. As publisher, we are providing a process for your intellectual property to be reviewed by and distributed to your peers. It is the author’s responsibility to obtain all necessary permissions for the inclusion of copyrighted materials, such as figures and tables from other publications, and to pay any and all necessary fees. Appropriate credit should be shown in the body of the work. Previously published work will not be considered for publication; we do not accept any simultaneous submissions. Education Libraries will, however, accept manuscripts based on presentations made at conferences sponsored by the Special Library Association, at the discretion of the co-editors.